Concrete Slab Design: Australian Standard AS3600
Structural engineering

Concrete Slab Design: Australian Standard AS3600

CalcTree
December 20, 2024

Learn and understand the requirements for different types of slabs and the design check following AS3600

CalcTree
December 20, 2024

Introduction

Concrete slabs are one of the most essential structural components in modern construction, providing the foundation for floors, roofs and other horizontal surfaces. Among the various types of slabs, one-way slabs, two-way slabs and flat slabs are commonly used due to their versatility, strength and adaptibility to different architectural and structural requirements.

Each type of slabs are designed to meet specific requirements based on factors such as span, load distribution, support configuration and construction requirements. In this article, each of the main slabs will be explained to understand the differences in structural behavior, design principles, and applications of these slab types is crucial for architects, engineers, and builders to optimize material usage, ensure stability, and meet functional and aesthetic goals in construction projects.

\( \textbf{1}\space\) Type of Slabs

\( \textbf{1.1}\space\) One way slabs Analysis

One way slabs is a structural element that primarily transfers loads in one direction and supported by beams or walls on two opposite sides, this allow bending of the slab to occur along the shorter span and since it is supported by two opposite sides, the slabs behaves like a series of parallel beams spanning between the supports.

the design moments of a one-way slab using simplified elastic analysis is given by:

$$ M^*=\text{coefficient} \times F_d L_n^2 $$

Where:

coefficient depends on the location of the \( M*\) under consideration, see figures below
\(F_d\) : The factored ULS design load per unit length \(kN/m\)
\(L_n\) : the clear span length
Figure 1 : Analysis of one-way slabs - more than two spans

\( \textbf{1.1.1}\space\) One-way slab requirements for simplified analysis

For one-way slabs, as per Clause 6.10.2, the simplified method is valid provided: 

  • the ratio of the longer to the shorter length of any two adjacent spans does not exceed 1.2
  • loads are uniformly distributed
  • \( Q < 2G\) , where \(Q\) = Live load & \(G\) = Dead Load
  • slab has a constant cross-section
  • reinforcement is arranged in accordance with Clause 9.1.3.2, which describes how much and the extent of top & bottom reinforcement with the slab span.
  • \(M∗\) at supports are only caused by loads applied to the beam or slab, not from the columns

\( \textbf{1.2}\space\)Two way slabs Analysis

A two-way slab is a structural element supported on all four sides, distributing loads in two perpendicular directions, while the load is shared and carried to supports in both directions. Bending occurs along both axes, making the slab more efficient in terms of strength and stiffness , the positive design moments (i.e. sagging moments) at midspan of a two-way slab supported on four sides, using simplified elastic analysis is given by:

$$ +M^*_x=\beta_x \times F_d L_x^2 \\+M^*_y=\beta_y \times F_d L_x^2 $$

Where:

\(\beta_x, \beta_y\) = Moment Coefficient
\(F_d\) = the factored ULS design load per unit area \(kN/m^2\)
\(L_x\) = shorter span length

The table below provides bending moment coefficient for different type of edge conditions using AS3600

AS3600-2018, Table 4.10.3.2(A)

👉 AS2600-2018 commentary provide equations for \(βx\)​ and \(βy​\) that derives Table 4.10.3.2(A), and these equations are used in this calculator.

\( \textbf{1.2.1}\space\) Continuous or Discontinuous edge

continuous edge means the slab is able to transfer load to the adjacent slab through that edge, while discontinuous edge means the slab is unable to transfer load to the adjacent slab through that edge, either because it is not detailed as continuous or it is the outside edge of a slab As per Clause 6.10.3, the negative design moments (i.e. hogging moments) of a two-way slab using simplified elastic analysis is given by:

  • at a continuous edge:

$$ -M^*_x=1.33 \times (+M^*_x) \\-M^*_y=1.33 \times (+M^*_y) $$

  • at a discontinuous edge

$$ -M^*_x=0.5 \times (+M^*_x) \\-M^*_y=0.5 \times (+M^*_y) $$

Figure 2 : Edge conditions of a two-way slab

The code says if the \(−M∗\) on one side of the support is different from that on the other side, the unbalanced moment can be redistributed or design the slab on both sides with the larger support moment. As per Clause 6.10.3, the simplified method is valid provided the conditions in the below toggle are met.

\( \textbf{1.2.2}\space\) Two-way slab requirements for simplified analysis

For two-way slabs supported on all four sides by walls or beams, as per Clause 6.10.3, the simplified method is valid provided:

  • loads are uniformly distributed
  • reinforcement is arranged in accordance with Clause 9.1.3.3, which describes how much and the extent of top & bottom reinforcement with the slab span.
  • \(M∗\) at supports are only caused by loads applied to the beam or slab, not from the columns\
  • openings in the slab are not big enough to adversely affect strength or stiffness
  • if using reinforcement with ductility class L, slabs are supported by walls (not beams)

\( \textbf{1.3}\space\) Flat slabs

Flat slabs is a type of reinforced concrete slab supported directly on columns without the use of beams. This construction method is common in modern building design due to its architectural flexibility, reduced floor-to-floor height, and easier construction.

Flat slab is also defined as a two-way slab supported by columns. Clause 6.10.4 presents a simplified elastic method where the slab is analysed one panel (unit strip) at a time. A total static moment in each direction in each panel is calculated as:

$$ M_o=\dfrac{F_dL_tL_o^2}{8} $$

Where:

\(F_d​\) is the uniformly distributed design load per unit area (kPa)

\(L_t\)​ is the width of the design strip, which for an interior design strip is taken as \(L_t\)=\(L_x\) ​in the longer span and \(L_t\)​=\(L_y\)​ in the shorter span. For edge design strips, it is taken as \(L_t\)=\(L_x/2\)​ in the longer span and \(L_t\)=\(L_y/2\)​ in the shorter span.

\(L_o\)​ is the effective span, which is taken as \(L_o\)​=\(L_y\)​ in the longer span and \(L_o\)​=\(L_x\)​ in the shorter span, for simplicity

The total static moment is then shared between the supports (negative moments) and the mid-span (positive moments) as shown below.

AS3600-2018 Commentary, Figure C6.10.4.2
Figure 3 : AS3600-2018 Commentary, Figure C6.10.4.2

At any critical section the design moment is determined by:


$$ M^*=\text{factor}\times M_o $$
Where the factor is given in Tables 6.10.4.3(A) & (B).

AS3600-2018, Table 6.10.4.2(A) & (B)

The positive and negative design moments are then distributed to the column and middle strips using the column strip moment factor in Table 6.9.5.3.

AS3600-2018, Table 6.9.5.3
FiAS3600-2018, Table 6.9.5.3

Figure 4 : Flat slab analysis for the longer span \(L_y\)​
Figure 5 : Flat slab analysis for the shorter span \(L_x\)​

Let's break this down, for example: you could calculate an \(M_o=408 \text{ kNm}\) in the longer span of the interior design strip. The sagging moment in the middle of the span is calculated as \(+M^*_y = 0.35 \times M_o=142.8 \text{ kNm}\) using the factor in Table 6.10.4.3(B). This sagging moment then needs to be distributed transversely to the column and middle strips. Using Table 6.9.5.3, we calculate \(0.5 \times (+M^*_y) = 71.4 \text{ kNm}\) is to be distributed to the column strip, and therefore leaving \(71.4/2 = 35.7 \text{ kNm}\) to each of the half middle strips.

Figure 6 : Example of flat slab analysis with \(M_o=408 \text{ kNm}\) for the sagging moment in an interior design strip, distributed to the column strip and middle strip

So essentially, we end up the following unique design moments:

  • 3x \(M^*_\text{end span in interior design strip} = \{-M^*_\text{exterior},-M^*_\text{interior},+M^*\}\) for the end spans in the interior design strip, which are then each distributed to the column strip and half of a middle strip, making 6x unique moments.
  • 2x \(M^*_\text{interior span in interior design strip} = \{-M^*,+M^*\}\) for the interior spans in the interior design strip, which are then each distributed to the column strip and two halves of a middle strip, making 4x unique moments.
  • 3x \(M^*_\text{end span in edge design strip} = \{-M^*_\text{exterior},-M^*_\text{interior},+M^*\}\) for the end spans in the edge design strip, which are then each distributed to the column strip and half of a middle strip, making 6x unique moments.
  • 2x \(M^*_\text{interior span in edge design strip} = \{-M^*,+M^*\}\) for the interior spans in the edge design strip, which are then each distributed to the column strip and two halves of a middle strip, making 4x unique moments.
  • 2x \(M^*_\text{total}= \{M^*_x,M^*_y\}\) for each direction (shorter and longer span direction), making 2x20 unique moments

That's 40 unique \(M∗\) for a flat-slab system, and even that's assuming a consistent grid i.e. \(L_y\)​ and \(L_x\)​ are constant!

The code says if the \(−M∗\) on one side of an interior support is different from that on the other side, the unbalanced moment can be redistributed or design the slab on both sides with the larger negative moment.

As per Clause 6.10.4, the simplified method is valid provided the conditions in the below toggle are met.

\( \textbf{1.3.1}\space\) Flat slab requirements for simplified analysis

For two-way slabs supported by columns (i.e. flat slabs), as per Clause 6.10.4, the simplified method is valid provided:

  • loads are uniformly distributed
  • \( Q < 2G\) , where \(Q\) = Live load & \(G\) = Dead Load
  • at least two continuous spans in each direction
  • support grid is roughly rectangular
  • successive span lengths in each direction do not differ by more then 1/3 of the longer span, and the end span cannot be longer then the adjacent interior span
  • lateral forces are resisted by shear walls or braced frames
  • reinforcement with ductility class L is not used for flexural reinforcement
  • reinforcement is arranged in accordance with Clause 9.1.3.4, which describes how much and the extent of top & bottom reinforcement with the slab span.
  • \(M*\) at supports are only caused by loads applied to the beam or slab, not from the columns

\( \textbf{2}\space\) Design Checks

\( \textbf{2.1}\space\) Flexure (ULS)

There are three main flexural checks that are required by Australian Standards:

  • moment capacity checks
  • ductility check
  • minimum reinforcement check (i.e minimum strength check

\( \textbf{2.2}\space\) Moment Capacity

Slab moment capacity is calculated the same way as a beam

Figure 7 : The strain and equivalent rectangular stress block of a typical RC slab section, without top reinforcement
Figure 8 : The strain and equivalent rectangular stress block of a typical RC slab section, with top reinforcement

Let's use the example of a cross-section with top and bottom reinforcement. Using the Rectangular Stress Block as per Cl. 8.1.2, we can determine the moment capacity of a section by taking moments about the \(C_c\)​ force:

$$ M_u=\phi [T_s\times \text{lever arm}_1 + C_s \times \text{lever arm}_2]\\M_u=\phi [A_{st}f_{sy}\times (d_{st}-\frac{\gamma k_ud}{2}) + A_{sc} \sigma_{sc} \times (\frac{\gamma k_ud}{2}-d_{sc})] $$

Where:

\(\phi\hspace{2.5em}\) = the capacity reduction factor
\(k_u\hspace{2.5em}\) = Depth ratio of neutral axis from the extreme compressive fibre to the bottom reinforcement, at ultimate strength.
\(k_ud\hspace{2.5em}\) = Depth of Neutral Axis

Factor \(k_u​\) is not defined explicitly in the standards and must be computed via force equilibrium.

$$ C_c+C_s=T_s\\ \alpha_{2}f'_c\gamma k_u d b +  A_{sc}\sigma_{sc} = A_{st}f_{sy} $$

Where :

\(\alpha_2=0.85-0.0015f'_c \ge 0.67\)
\(\gamma = 0.97-0.0025 f'_c \ge 0.67\)
\(\sigma_{sc} = \min(f_{sy},E_s \varepsilon_{sc})\) is the stress in the reinforcement in the compressive zone
\(\varepsilon_{sc}=\varepsilon_{cu}(1-\frac{d_{sc}}{k_ud})\)is the strain in the reinforcement in the compressive zone, and is derived from similar triangles in the figure above
\(\varepsilon_{su}=0.003\) is the maximum strain in the extreme compressive concrete fibre as per Clause 8.1.3

If \(\sigma_{sc} \geq f_{sy}\) then \(k_u\) is given by: 

$$ \\\rightarrow k_u = \dfrac{f_{sy}(A_{st}-A_{sc})}{\alpha_{2}f'_c\gamma db} $$

If \(\sigma_{sc}  < f_{sy}\) then \(k_u\) is found by solving the following quadratic equation: 

$$ \alpha_{2}f'_c\gamma k_u d b +  A_{sc}E_{s}\varepsilon_{cu}(1-\dfrac{d_{sc}}{k_ud}) = A_{st}f_{sy} $$

We then substitute \(k_u\)​ in the moment capacity equation to arrive at our answer.

\( \textbf{2.3}\space\) Ductility Check

It is universal practice to ensure your concrete section is ductile. A ductile section means the reinforcement will yield before the concrete crushes, which is deemed a less dangerous failure mechanism since the failure occurs relatively slow compared to a sudden brittle failure. As per Cl 8.1.5, the code ensures ductile failure by checking:

$$ k_{uo} \le 0.36 $$

where \(k_{uo} = k_{u}\) for a section in pure bending.

\( \textbf{2.4}\space\) Minimum Reinforcement Check

Clause 8.1.6 specifies minimum strength requirements. Clause 9.1.1 specifies an adjustment to this for two-way slabs.

Therefore, for reinforced concrete sections, the minimum strength requirement is deemed to be satisfied if \(A_{st}\)​ satisfies the following:

$$ A_{st}\geq [\alpha_b(D/d)^2f'_{ct.f}/f_{sy}]b_wd $$

Where:

\(\alpha_b=0.2\) for one way slabs
\(\alpha_b=0.24\) for two way slabs supported by columns at their corners
\(\alpha_b=0.19\) for two way slabs supported by beams or walls on four sides

\( \textbf{2.5}\space\)  Shear (ULS)

Since slab depths are typically small, shear is rarely a critical consideration. Except for flat slabs at column supports, punching shear must be checked. For punching shear calculation of a flat slab, check out our Concrete Punching Shear Calculator to AS3600.

\( \textbf{2.6}\space\) Deflection (SLS)

Clause 9.4 provides guidance for the deflection of slabs. A popular approach because of it's simplicity, is to follow Clause 9.4.4 which describes a deemed to conform span-to-depth ratio for deflections in RC slabs.

As per Clause 9.4.4, slab deflections are deemed to conform to code requirements if the following is satisfied:

$$ L_{ef} / d \leq k_3 k_4 \left[ \dfrac{(\Delta/L_{ef})1000 E_c}{F_{d.ef}}\right]^{1/3} $$

Where :

\(\Delta/L_{ef}\hspace{2.5em}\)= deflection limit, chosen by the user
\(L_{ef}\hspace{2.5em}\)= the effective span, where  \(L_{ef}\)​=\(L_y\)​ in one-way slabs or two-way flat slabs, and \(L_{ef}\)​=\(L_x​\) in two-way slabs supported on four sides
\(d\hspace{2.5em}\) = Slab Effective Depth
\(F_{d.ef}\hspace{2.5em}\) = the effective design service load \(kPa\)

$$ \hspace{1cm}\rightarrow (1.0+k_{cs})G+ (\psi_s+k_{sc} \psi_1)Q \hspace{0.5cm}\text{for total deflection} \\\hspace{1cm}\rightarrow k_{cs}G+ (\psi_s+k_{sc} \psi_1)Q \hspace{1.7cm}\text{for incremental deflection} $$

\(k_{cs}=(2-1.2 A_{sc}/A_{st}] \geq0.8\) where \(\psi_s, \psi_l\) is from Table 4.1 in AS1170.0 and \(A_{sc}/A_{st}\) is taken at midspan for simply supported and continuous slabs
\(k_3 = 1.0\) for one way slabs nd two-way slabs supported on four sides, \(k_3 = 0.95\) for multi-span two-way flat slab without drop panels, \(k_3 = 1.05\)for multi-span two-way flat slab with drop panels
\(k_4 = 1.4\) for simply support slabs, \(k_4 = 1.75\) for an end span of continuous slab, \(k_4 = 2.1\) for an interior span in a continuous slab
AS3600-2018, Table 2.3.2
AS3600-2018, Table 2.3.2

To use the above deflection check, Clause 9.4.4 states conditions that must be satisfied:

  • uniform slab depth
  • fully propped during construction
  • loads are uniformly distributed and \(Q \leq G\)
  • for two-way flat slabs with drop panels, drop panels must extend at least \(L/6\) in each direction on each side of the support centre-line, and have an overall depth not less then \(1.3×\) slab thickness beyond the drops
  • for continuous one-way slabs or two-way flat slabs, in adjoining spans, the ratio of the longer span to the shorter span does not exceed 1.2, and no end span is longer than an interior span
Related templates
Ready to try?

Streamline your engineering workflows today!

Join engineers from top firms who've signed up

Try CalcTree free
AECOM
ARCADIS
aurecon
Jacobs
MOTT MACDONALD
wsp